Summary
At the stage of preliminary evidence gathering, since we were able to collect evidence related to the counterfeiter’s act of selling infringing goods online, the infringer’s act of infringement while the civil suit was pending, written decision of past administrative punishment, written decision on refusal of misappropriated trademark application, and past transaction documents, we were able to demonstrate the scale and duration of infringement and maliciousness of the infringer, which were ultimately adopted by the court.
Furthermore, in recent years, the amount of damages is of an increasing trend even when the legal compensation is applied, and in such a case the key factors of consideration are the defendant’s maliciousness, scale and duration of infringement, famousness of the plaintiff’s trademark, court costs, etc. The court also considered these circumstances in this case, and ordered the defendant to pay roughly 2,000,000 yuan as damages, even though this is within the scope of legal compensation.